Crypto Industry Dominates $517M Corporate Election Spending Ahead of 2026 Midterms

The cryptocurrency industry has emerged as the single biggest corporate political spender in the United States, channeling $189 million into the 2026 midterm elections — a sum that already exceeds everything the sector spent throughout the entire 2024 electoral cycle, according to a report released June 30 by consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen.
That $189 million represents 37% of the $517 million in total corporate political spending reported so far for the 2026 midterms. Remarkably, this figure already surpasses the previous all-time record of $461 million set across the full 2024 election cycle — and Election Day is still months away. The report, compiled by Public Citizen researcher Rick Claypool using Federal Election Commission data, also highlights that corporations have now funneled nearly one-third of all post-Citizens United spending — totaling $1.58 billion since the Supreme Court's landmark 2010 ruling — into a single election cycle.
A key driver behind this wave of political money is what the report describes as "corporate supremacist super PACs" — committees organized not along partisan lines, but specifically to advance the policy interests of particular industries. This playbook was pioneered by the crypto sector in 2024 and is now being adopted by other major industries.
The flagship crypto-aligned super PAC, Fairshake, has collected $82.6 million in corporate donations this cycle, accounting for 60% of its $135 million total war chest. Coinbase injected $33 million into the committee, while Ripple Labs contributed an even larger $48.5 million. Josh Vlasto, a Fairshake co-leader and former chief of staff to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, described the group's approach as an "aggressive, targeted strategy" designed to back pro-crypto candidates nationwide.
Venture capital powerhouse Andreessen Horowitz, one of Fairshake's leading supporters in 2024, has redirected its political energy for 2026. The firm put $50 million into Leading the Future, a new super PAC focused on artificial intelligence policy. That committee has raised $75.1 million overall, with corporate dollars comprising 67% of the total. When combined with personal contributions from firm co-founders Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, the firm's combined political footprint swells to $115.5 million.
A third industry-specific super PAC, Win for America, has received $43 million exclusively from online sports betting giants FanDuel and DraftKings — $19.5 million each — making corporate funds 100% of its reported financing.
Corporations have also made MAGA Inc. — the super PAC established to support Trump-endorsed candidates — a major recipient of this spending wave. The committee has received $120.6 million in corporate contributions this cycle, representing 35% of its $342 million total. Foris Dax, the parent company of Crypto.com, is the committee's top corporate donor at $35 million. Additional crypto contributors include Blockchain.com ($5 million), Gemini Trust Company ($4.4 million), and Ondo Finance ($2.1 million).
Tools for Humanity Corporation, the biometric identity company led by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, donated $5 million to MAGA Inc. in the days just before President Trump's inauguration — a contribution that drew attention after Altman later stated publicly that he "would love to see money out of politics." OpenAI president Greg Brockman and his wife Anna contributed $25 million each to both MAGA Inc. and Leading the Future. The Wall Street Journal reported that Brockman and OpenAI's global affairs chief Chris Lehane were involved in launching the latter super PAC.
Despite the record-breaking totals, the $517 million figure likely understates the full scale of corporate political activity. Meta Platforms is separately spending an estimated $65 million through non-federal super PACs aimed at blocking state-level AI regulations, and Anthropic has pledged $20 million to a group supporting AI safety candidates — neither of which is reflected in current FEC filings. Dark money organizations, which face no donor disclosure requirements, further obscure the true scope of corporate influence in the 2026 midterms.


