India's Central Bank Advocates for Separation of Crypto from Banking
The Reserve Bank of India seeks to separate cryptocurrencies from the banking system, advocating restrictions on their use as payment methods.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has expressed its desire for lawmakers to ensure that cryptocurrencies are isolated from the banking system. In a recent testimony before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, the central bank asserted that digital assets should not be used as payment methods.
Call for Crypto Containment
The committee is currently studying virtual digital assets and is set to present its findings during the upcoming monsoon session. During the hearing, it was highlighted that the RBI prefers a strategy focused on containing cryptocurrencies as opposed to traditional regulation. The central bank cautioned that establishing formal regulations might inadvertently validate speculative assets, thus creating a false sense of security among retail investors.
Concerns Over Illicit Activities
Long-standing apprehensions regarding the potential for illicit finance associated with cryptocurrencies were reiterated by RBI officials. These include the risks linked to drug trafficking and terrorism financing, and similar warnings have also been issued by other central banks in emerging markets this year.
Historical Context
This push for legislative separation comes after a notable defeat for the RBI in 2020 when the Supreme Court overturned its banking prohibition on cryptocurrencies. Now, the central bank is advocating for a legal framework that clearly delineates the banking sector from digital assets.
No Use of Crypto for Payments
The RBI has recommended that the use of cryptocurrencies for payments and settlements be strictly prohibited, along with imposing strict limits on the banking sector's direct exposure to these digital assets. This stance aligns with cautionary principles found in various global regulatory frameworks, although many regions are leaning towards licensing rather than outright exclusion.
In the context of ongoing international regulatory developments, the United States recently implemented a CBDC ban through 2030. However, committee members challenged the RBI's stance, highlighting that countries like Indonesia, Hong Kong, and the UAE are progressing with regulatory frameworks while India, which ranks first in the 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, remains hesitant.
Future Regulatory Directions
Officials from the RBI remarked, “Not having a policy is also a policy,” emphasizing the complexity of the situation. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has indicated potential regulation of tokens deemed as securities, although the RBI has yet to provide a definitive answer on this matter.
Additionally, the proposal distinguishes between cryptocurrencies and tokenized government bonds, allowing for the development of the latter within a regulated framework while targeting speculation in the former. Despite facing a 30% tax and a 1% levy on cryptocurrency trades, industry advocates continue to call for softened regulations, including support for domestic Bitcoin mining as an alternative to gold imports.
The parliamentary panel is set to meet with the Department of Economic Affairs on July 15 to finalize its recommendations, with forthcoming weeks expected to clarify whether India will adopt a policy of isolation or move towards a regulatory framework similar to the EU's MiCA.


